Succeeding items and the shorter is the interval between List the less subject it is to retroactive inhibition from ![]() Probability of recall may be taken as an index of ![]() Items from the end of the list are likely to be recalledįirst (Bousfield, Cohen, and Silva, 1956 Deese, 1957 ĭeese and Kaufman, 1957 Postman and Phillips,ġ965). There is a high correlation between probability of recall and order of recall so that Recency over primacy increases with the length of the Presentation such that new items occupy more favorable serial positions than old itemsĭuring successive presentations of the list.Ī test of free recall given immediately after the presentation of a list of words normally yields a serialposition curve with a sharp recency effect and a relatively less pronounced primacy effect. Paper indicates that the priority effect is due largely, if not entirely, to biases in the order of The priority of new items in recall has been viewed as inconsistent with theĪssumption that order of recall reflects relative item strength. ![]() Those given for the first time, to be reproduced earlier than items which had been recalled ![]() On successive tests of free recall there is a significant tendency for newly recalled items, i.e., University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |